Hi Wilzer, Aidelly looks great. A couple of questions:

Any plan to add Mastodon as a supported platform? I don’t see it on the Roadmap.

I was recently using another posting tool and I found an issue with it: when posting on Bluesky, hashtags go out as part of the post text but aren’t recognised by Bluesky as hashtags (normally hashtags on Bluesky are clickable links that show you posts with that hashtag). Does Aidelly handle hashtags correctly for Bluesky?

Thanks very much!
Peter.

Do you have an ETA for the whitelabel feature and custom domain for the Agency Plan?

I’m planning to purchase Tier 3 and would like to resell your software as a white-label solution under my own brand.

I understand that long-term sustainability depends on credits, currently priced at USD 0.01 per credit, and I agree that it makes sense not to impose limits on workspaces, team members, or social connections, except for Twitter/X, given its higher associated costs.

That said, after reviewing your pricing, it appears that credit consumption can vary significantly depending on the task. My concern is that the current usage cost may become a barrier for resale. For LTD/Agency Plan customers, would you be open to offering a discounted overage rate below the current USD 0.01 per credit? If so, I’d appreciate hearing your best possible price.

There are two key considerations here. First, the rate should not be so low that it puts your margins at risk if costs increase in the future. Second, it should also not be set too high, since most of the support and marketing effort, roughly 80% of the total, will be handled on our side. In that context, you may ultimately earn more net profit from a lower margin spread across many resellers than from maintaining higher margins with end customers.

There’s no rush on this, so please feel free to take a few days to consider it. My goal is simply to find a pricing model that allows both sides to grow together fairly. If you can offer your best rate, your platform would be in a much stronger position among the white-label solutions we promote and resell under our own brand.

Thanks for your time 😉

Dear Wilzer,

The most recent announcements in the EarlyBird group and via email mention that we will now have BYOK, correct?

1 – So, in that case, we no longer need to worry about credits, since we will be using our own API key?

2 – Which LLMs are supported: OpenAI, Claude, Gemini?

Thank you!

Todas as integrações para postagens e DMs são oficiais pelas plataformas citadas?

It is possible to use a separate API key for each Workspace.

What is the difference between white-labeling Aidelly and reselling it? You mentioned a couple of times that reselling is not allowed, but that white-labeling is coming.

I want to white-label it as my own app and offer it to my clients. So what exactly is considered reselling, and how is that different from selling a white-labeled version of the tool to my clients as my own app?

I’m planning to buy Aidelly mainly for the X integration, possibly the highest tier if I’m fully convinced.

How does Aidelly compare with Typefully in terms of X integration?

Also, it’s great that you currently offer X integration, but what about the future? Is there any chance the X integration could be removed later due to high API costs?

I’d really appreciate a detailed answer to these questions.

Interested in integrations with Telegram, Reddit, Mastodon — are they planned? And will it be possible to use HTML tags for posts, like, for example, Publer allows?

I also tested the scheduler a bit and would recommend adding a character limit indicator for each social network according to the post length. Currently, only the total character count is displayed.

Post previews are also a useful feature.

Any options to schedule out at least to up to a year? Also builk media generation is a must!

Can I have my clients have their own BYOK, or is BYOK only from one source?

Is there any Video file size upload limits per video or per api request for bulk uploading videos & scheduling them across socials? Asking, since Long-form and short-form videos are very different beasts.

Hey AiDelly team — love what you’re building & your responsiveness to comments and the community that’s building. I want to make a case for something I think could be a genuine category differentiator for you.

Every major scheduler — Buffer, Later, Hootsuite, Sprout — covers the same western stack. YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn. That’s it. The rest of the world is essentially unserved by polished tooling, and that gap represents a real pricing and positioning opportunity for whoever moves first.

Here’s how I see the priority order based on audience size and API availability:

VK (Russian, 100M MAU) has a surprisingly open and well-documented API. Almost no Western scheduler has clean native support for it. The Russian-speaking creator and e-commerce market is starved for good tooling and there is basically zero competition from the big names in that lane.

Niconico (Japanese, 50M MAU) has a partial API and the Japanese creator market is enormous. They are notoriously underserved by English-first tools and willing to pay premium for localized solutions. Niche Japanese SaaS products routinely generate strong MRR on small user bases simply because real alternatives don’t exist in their language.

Pinterest (520M MAU) already has a full easy API and is massively underrated for wellness, spiritual, and education content discovery. I’m surprised more schedulers don’t push this one harder.

Weibo (600M MAU) requires a Chinese business entity to access the API which makes it hard, but even a read-only analytics connection would be valuable. Bilibili (340M MAU) has no public posting API so it would need an MCN intermediary relationship, but for creators in education one of the most important untapped platforms in the world. Services serving the markets as MCNs for corporations or Multinational Corporations usually start at 3-5k/m paid annually for the most basic plans up to 10 profiles. This could be a serious market differentiator alone.

The revenue case is simple. The moment you support even one non-English platform that competitors don’t, you can charge a $20 to $50 per month premium per seat and justify it completely. Verticalized schedulers built for specific niches regularly charge $1000s per month on basic plans because they own a lane nobody else is in. Non-English platform breadth is the exact same model applied globally.

Would love to know if any of these are on your roadmap or if you see the potential in this vision

Hi Wilzer, I know the previous user asked about Mastodon. I interested in Mastodon and decentralized and federated social network as a whole. I am sick and tired with large social media corporations and the info they collect from us. Can you let me know if you have serious plans to add Mastodon and other decentralized and federated social network. You seem like a nice guy. I am hoping you are not just going to tell me what I want to hear. I would appreciate and respect realistic and honest response that tells me if this is high on your priority and frealistic timeline of when decentralized and federated social network can go live on Aidelly? Thank you. Ryan